Thorough assessment of the effectiveness of belimumab in a large Spanish multicenter cohort of systemic lupus erythematosus patients.

OBJECTIVES: To provide an overview on the current use of belimumab (BLM) in SLE patients in clinical practice and to examine its efficacy in terms of standardized outcomes, drug survival, as well as patient and safety profiles. METHODS: A longitudinal retrospective multicentre cohort including SLE patients treated with BLM at 18 Spanish centers. Data was collected upon initiation of BLM, at 6 and 12 months after initiation, and at the last recorded visit. Changes in SLEDAI-2K, the proportion of patients who achieved LLDAS and DORIS 2021, and number of flares were compared between visits. Changes in damage, glucocorticoids use and employment status pre-BLM and post-BLM were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 324 patients were included with a mean follow-up of 3.8 (±2.7) years. LLDAS was attained by 45.8%, 62% and 71% of patients, and DORIS by 24%, 36.2% and 52.5% on successive visits, respectively. Twenty-seven-point two percent of patients were in DORIS ≥ 50% of the visits and a 46% in LLDAS-50. Flares and number of flares were significantly lower one year after treatment with BLM and no changes in damage accrual were observed. Mean (±SD) prednisone dose was significantly reduced over time, with 70 (24%) patients discontinuing GC. CONCLUSION: Our study not only demonstrates belimumab´s efficacy in attaining treat-to-target goals in SLE patients, but also confirms its GC-sparing effect, and its prevention of flares and organ damage accrual.

Clinical characteristics and risk factors associated with lymphoma in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a nationwide cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the characteristics and risk of lymphoma in a large cohort of patients with SLE. METHODS: A case-cohort analysis was performed within a dynamic cohort of SLE patients from the Spanish Society of Rheumatology Lupus Registry (RELESSER). Clinical and analytical features were compared between the lymphoma SLE group and the control SLE group using an independent-sample Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney test for continuous variables and the χ2 test for categorical variables with Fisher's exact test if necessary. The multivariate analysis was based on a generalized linear model. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients with SLE and lymphoma and 3965 non-lymphoma controls with SLE were studied. Most lymphomas were of B cell origin (n = 15/21), with diffuse large B cell lymphoma being the most frequent histological type (8/21, 38.1%). As in the general population, the risk of lymphoma in SLE was higher in male than in female patients and increased with age. In the lymphoma SLE group, bivariate analysis showed a significantly higher percentage of pericarditis, organic brain syndrome, seizures, vasculitis, haemolytic anaemia, splenomegaly, venous thrombosis and mean modified (excluding lymphoma) SLICC/ACR damage index. In contrast, renal involvement, positive anti-dsDNA, and antimalarials ever were less frequent. CONCLUSIONS: In this large multicentre Spanish cohort, we identified characteristics of SLE that are associated with a higher risk of lymphoma. Antimalarials were significantly negatively associated with risk of lymphoma in SLE patients. Nevertheless, further prospective studies are needed to clarify these findings.

Relevance of gastrointestinal manifestations in a large Spanish cohort of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: what do we know?

OBJECTIVE: SLE can affect any part of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. GI symptoms are reported to occur in >50% of SLE patients. To describe the GI manifestations of SLE in the RELESSER (Registry of SLE Patients of the Spanish Society of Rheumatology) cohort and to determine whether these are associated with a more severe disease, damage accrual and a worse prognosis. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide, retrospective, multicentre, cross-sectional cohort study of 3658 SLE patients who fulfil ≥4 ACR-97 criteria. Data on demographics, disease characteristics, activity (SLEDAI-2K or BILAG), damage (SLICC/ACR/DI) and therapies were collected. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between lupus patients with and without GI damage to establish whether GI damage is associated with a more severe disease. RESULTS: From 3654 lupus patients, 3.7% developed GI damage. Patients in this group (group 1) were older, they had longer disease duration, and were more likely to have vasculitis, renal disease and serositis than patients without GI damage (group 2). Hospitalizations and mortality were significantly higher in group 1. Patients in group 1 had higher modified SDI (SLICC Damage Index). The presence of oral ulcers reduced the risk of developing damage in 33% of patients. CONCLUSION: Having GI damage is associated with a worse prognosis. Patients on a high dose of glucocorticoids are at higher risk of developing GI damage which reinforces the strategy of minimizing glucocorticoids. Oral ulcers appear to decrease the risk of GI damage.

Estándares de calidad asistencial para las consultas externas de reumatología. El proyecto EXTRELLA / Quality standards for rheumatology outpatient clinic. The EXTRELLA project

Introducción. En los últimos años, el peso específico de las consultas externas ha aumentado considerablemente. En la actualidad, la mayor parte de la atención reumatológica se lleva a cabo en esta área del hospital. Sin embargo, apenas existe documentación respecto a estándares de calidad asistencial. Objetivo. Desarrollar, mediante consenso, estándares de calidad asistencial específicos para las consultas externas de reumatología. Método. El proyecto se llevó a cabo mediante metodología Delphi a 2 rondas. Se contó con la participación de un comité científico (13 reumatólogos), 5 grupos nominales (45 reumatólogos y 12 enfermeras especializadas) y un grupo de discusión formado por 9 pacientes. Se generaron de forma sucesiva diversos borradores hasta obtener un documento final que incluyó los estándares que recibieron una puntuación igual o superior a 7 en al menos el 70% de los participantes. Resultados. El documento consta de 148 estándares distribuidos en 9 áreas temáticas: a) estructura (22); b) actividad clínica y relación con los pacientes (34); c) planificación (7); d) niveles de prioridad (5); e) relación con atención primaria, con el servicio de urgencias y con otros servicios del hospital (20); f) proceso (26); g) enfermería (13); h) docencia e investigación (13), e i) cómputo de actividad (8). Conclusión. Se han consensuado unos estándares de calidad asistencial que pueden ser útiles para organizar la actividad en las consultas externas de los servicios de reumatología y servir como marco de referencia a la hora de elevar propuestas de mejora a la gerencia del hospital o a otros estamentos de la administración (AU)

Introduction. In recent years, outpatient clinics have undergone extensive development. At present, patients with rheumatic diseases are mainly assisted in this area. However, the quality standards of care are poorly documented. Objective. To develop specific quality criteria and standards for an outpatient rheumatology clinic. Method. The project was based on the two-round Delphi method. The following groups of participants took part: scientific committee (13 rheumatologists), five nominal groups (45 rheumatologists and 12 nurses) and a group of discussion formed by 9 patients. Different drafts were consecutively generated until a final document was obtained that included the standards that received a punctuation equal or over 7 in at least 70% of the participants. Results. 148 standards were developed, grouped into the following 9 dimensions: a) structure (22), b) clinical activity and relationship with the patients (34), c) planning (7), d) levels of priority (5), e) relations with primary care physicians, with Emergency Department and with other clinical departments, f) process (26), g) nursing (13), h) teaching and research (13) and i) activity measures (8). Conclusion. This study established specific quality standards for rheumatology outpatient clinic. It can be a useful tool for organising this area in the Rheumatology Department and as a reference when proposing improvement measures to health administrators (AU)

Quality standards for rheumatology outpatient clinic. The EXTRELLA project. / Estándares de calidad asistencial para las consultas externas de reumatología. El proyecto EXTRELLA.

INTRODUCTION: In recent years, outpatient clinics have undergone extensive development. At present, patients with rheumatic diseases are mainly assisted in this area. However, the quality standards of care are poorly documented. OBJECTIVE: To develop specific quality criteria and standards for an outpatient rheumatology clinic. METHOD: The project was based on the two-round Delphi method. The following groups of participants took part: scientific committee (13 rheumatologists), five nominal groups (45 rheumatologists and 12 nurses) and a group of discussion formed by 9 patients. Different drafts were consecutively generated until a final document was obtained that included the standards that received a punctuation equal or over 7 in at least 70% of the participants. RESULTS: 148 standards were developed, grouped into the following 9 dimensions: a) structure (22), b) clinical activity and relationship with the patients (34), c) planning (7), d) levels of priority (5), e) relations with primary care physicians, with Emergency Department and with other clinical departments, f) process (26), g) nursing (13), h) teaching and research (13) and i) activity measures (8). CONCLUSION: This study established specific quality standards for rheumatology outpatient clinic. It can be a useful tool for organising this area in the Rheumatology Department and as a reference when proposing improvement measures to health administrators.

Interleukin-1RN gene polymorphisms in elderly patients with rheumatic inflammatory chronic conditions: Association of IL-1RN*2/2 genotype with polymyalgia rheumatica.

The objective of this study was to investigate whether there is an association between IL1RN polymorphism and disease susceptibility for three age-related inflammatory conditions: polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR), giant cell arteritis (GCA), and elderly-onset rheumatoid arthritis (EORA). A tandem-repeat polymorphism within IL1RN intron 2 was analyzed in 139 PMR, 69 GCA, and 156 RA patients (75 with EORA) as well as in 437 healthy subjects, together with the in vitro production of IL-1beta. Our results showed that the IL1RN*2/2 genotype was more frequent in PMR patients compared with controls (p = 0.032, odds ratio = 1.785, 95% confidence interval = 1.047-3.044) and GCA patients (p = 0.008, odds ratio = 4.661, 95% confidence interval = 1.352-16.065). We found no difference in the distribution of genotypes between PMR and EORA or between EORA and controls. However, the frequency of the IL-1RN*2/2 genotype had a tendency to be higher in patients with EORA compared with young onset RA. The presence of IL1RN*1 or IL1RN*2 allele was not associated with severity of the disease in PMR and GCA patients and did not influence the production of IL-1beta. In conclusion, the IL1RN*2 polymorphism in a homozygous state was associated with an increased susceptibility to PMR and may give some clues for a differential therapy with GCA.

HLA-DRB1 allele distribution in polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis: influence on clinical subgroups and prognosis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate HLA-DRB1 associations in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) and giant cell arteritis (GCA) in the Spanish population, especially those alleles that include the disease-linked sequence motif DRYF (positions 28 to 31 of the HVR2). METHODS: We performed a PCR based HLA-DRB1 genotyping in 89 PMR patients, 44 GCA patients, and 99 unrelated healthy controls from the same geographic area. RESULTS: We did not find any significant difference between the whole group of PMR/GCA patients (n = 133) compared with the healthy controls with the exception of a lower frequency of HLA-DRB1*0405 in the patient group (odds ratio [OR], 0.1 [CI0.02 to 1.2]; P =.04). The distribution of DRB1 alleles was very similar between PMR patients and controls. However, DRB1*0401 (OR, 3.1 [1.1 to 8.6]; P =.02) and DRB1*0404 (OR, 3.5 [0.97 to 12.9]; P =.04) were overrepresented in patients with GCA compared with the control group. DRB1*04 (OR, 1.9 [0.96 to 3.8]; P =.06), especially *0401 (OR, 2.8 [1 to 7.7]; P =.04), and DRB1*07 (OR, 2.3 [1.2 to 4.6]; P =.01) were more frequent in GCA than in PMR. Frequency of the DRYF 28-31 motif was similar among GCA (79.5%), PMR (89.9%), and controls (87.9%) and did not confer any significant risk of the development of systemic vasculitis. We also compared the DRB1 allele distribution in patients with classic PMR (n = 58) and those with an erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) <40 mm/hour (n = 31). Patients with classic PMR expressed DRB1*07 less frequently (OR, 0.4 [0.1 to 1]; P =.04) and had a higher frequency of the DRYF 28-31 motif (94.8% vs 80.6%; P =.03) than patients with ESR < 40. Within the GCA group, DRB1 alleles were not predictive for the development of severe ischemic complications. However, the development of relapses in patients with PMR was associated with a higher frequency of DRB1*09 (5.6% vs 0%; P =.04). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the HLA-DRB1 alleles associated with susceptibility for developing PMR and GCA are different. Whether PMR with low ESR represents a different clinical subset of the disease should be clarified in a larger sample of patients. HLA-DRB1 genes might predict the presence of relapses in PMR, but they do not seem to be indicators of severe disease in GCA patients.